Dinosaur Wiki
Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus Rex (1)
'Jurassic Park Tyrannosaurus rex'



Name Translation:

Tyrant Lizard King


Late Cretaceous (68-66 mya)


42-49 feet long(12.8-14.9 meters)


15-21 feet tall (4.5-6.4 meters)


6.6-9 tonnes

Tyrannosaurus (pronounced /tɨˌrænəˈsɔːrəs/ or /taɪˌrænoʊˈsɔːrəs/, meaning 'tyrant lizard') is a genus of theropod dinosaur. The famous species Tyrannosaurus rex ('rex' meaning 'king' in Latin), commonly abbreviated to T. rex, is a fixture in popular culture around the world, and is extensively used in scientific television and movies, such as documentaries and Jurassic Park, and in children's series such as The Land Before Time. Tyrannosaurus lived throughout what is now western North America, with a much wider range than other tyrannosaurids. Fossils of T. rex are found in a variety of rock formations dating to the last three million years of the Cretaceous Period, approximately 68 to 65 million years ago; it was among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist prior to the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event.

Like other tyrannosaurids, Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two primary digits, along with a possible third vestigial digit. Although other theropods rivaled or exceeded T. rex in size, it was the largest known tyrannosaurid and one of the largest known land predators, measuring up to 13 metres (43 ft.) in length,[1] up to 4 metres (13 ft.) tall at the hips,[2] and up to 6.8 metric tonnes (7.5 short tons) in weight.[3] By far the largest carnivore in its environment, T. rex may have been an apex predator, preying upon hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, although some experts have suggested it was primarily a scavenger.

More than 30 specimens of T. rex have been identified, some of which are nearly complete skeletons. Soft tissue and proteins have been reported in at least one of these specimens. The abundance of fossil material has allowed significant research into many aspects of its biology, including life history and biomechanics. The feeding habits, physiology and potential speed of T. rex are a few subjects of debate. Its taxonomy is also controversial, with some scientists considering Tarbosaurus bataar from Asia to represent a second species of Tyrannosaurus and others maintaining Tarbosaurus as a separate genus. Several other genera of North American tyrannosaurids have also been synonymized with Tyrannosaurus. Tyrannosaurus Chicks



Various specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex with a human for scale.


Size comparison of selected giant theropod dinosaurs, with Tyrannosaurus in purple.

Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest land carnivores of all time; the largest complete specimen, FMNH PR2081 ("Sue"), measured 12.8 metres (42 ft) long, and was 4.0 metres (13 ft) tall at the hips.[2] Mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons),[4] to less than 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons),[5][6] with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 and 6.8 metric tons (6.0 and 7.5 short tons).[7][8][9][3] Although Tyrannosaurus rex was larger than the well known Jurassic theropod Allosaurus, it was slightly smaller than Cretaceous carnivores Spinosaurus and Giganotosaurus.[10][11]

The neck of T. rex formed a natural S-shaped curve like that of other theropods, but was short and muscular to support the massive head. The forelimbs were long thought to bear only two digits, but there is an unpublished report of a third, vestigial digit in one specimen.[12] In contrast the hind limbs were among the longest in proportion to body size of any theropod. The tail was heavy and long, sometimes containing over forty vertebrae, in order to balance the massive head and torso. To compensate for the immense bulk of the animal, many bones throughout the skeleton were hollow, reducing its weight without significant loss of strength.[1]


The largest known T. rex skulls measure up to 5 feet (1.5 m) in length.[13] Large fenestrae (openings) in the skull reduced weight and provided areas for muscle attachment, as in all carnivorous theropods. But in other respects Tyrannosaurus’ skull was significantly different from those of large non-tyrannosauroid theropods. It was extremely wide at the rear but had a narrow snout, allowing unusually good binocular vision.[14][15] The skull bones were massive and the nasals and some other bones were fused, preventing movement between them; but many were pneumatized (contained a "honeycomb" of tiny air spaces) which may have made the bones more flexible as well as lighter. These and other skull-strengthening features are part of the tyrannosaurid trend towards an increasingly powerful bite, which easily surpassed that of all non-tyrannosaurids.[16][17][18] The tip of the upper jaw was U-shaped (most non-tyrannosauroid carnivores had V-shaped upper jaws), which increased the amount of tissue and bone a tyrannosaur could rip out with one bite, although it also increased the stresses on the front teeth.[19][20]

T rex restoration

Life restoration of a Tyrannosaurus rex.

The teeth of T. rex displayed marked heterodonty (differences in shape).[21][1] The premaxillary teeth at the front of the upper jaw were closely packed, D-shaped in cross-section, had reinforcing ridges on the rear surface, were incisiform (their tips were chisel-like blades) and curved backwards. The D-shaped cross-section, reinforcing ridges and backwards curve reduced the risk that the teeth would snap when Tyrannosaurus bit and pulled. The remaining teeth were robust, like "lethal bananas" rather than daggers; more widely spaced and also had reinforcing ridges.[22] Those in the upper jaw were larger than those in all but the rear of the lower jaw. The largest found so far is estimated to have been 30 centimetres (12 in) long including the root when the large reptile was alive, making it the largest tooth of any carnivorous dinosaur.[2]


Life history[]

T-rex graph

A graph showing the hypothesized growth curves (body mass versus age) of four tyrannosaurids. Tyrannosaurus rex is drawn in black. Based on Erickson et al. 2004.

The identification of several specimens as juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex has allowed scientists to document ontogenetic changes in the species, estimate the lifespan, and determine how quickly the animals would have grown. The smallest known individual (LACM 28471, the "Jordan theropod") is estimated to have weighed only 29.9 kg (66 lbs), while the largest, such as FMNH PR2081 ("Sue") most likely weighed over 5400 kg (6 short tons). Histologic analysis of T. rex bones showed LACM 28471 had aged only 2 years when it died, while "Sue" was 28 years old, an age which may have been close to the maximum for the species.[3]

Histology has also allowed the age of other specimens to be determined. Growth curves can be developed when the ages of different specimens are plotted on a graph along with their mass. A T. rex growth curve is S-shaped, with juveniles remaining under 1,800 kg (2 short tons) until approximately 14 years of age, when body size began to increase dramatically. During this rapid growth phase, a young T. rex would gain an average of 600 kg (1,300 lbs) a year for the next four years. At 18 years of age, the curve plateaus again, indicating that growth slowed dramatically. For example, only 600 kg (1,300 lbs) separated the 28-year-old "Sue" from a 22-year-old Canadian specimen (RTMP 81.12.1).[3] Another recent histological study performed by different workers corroborates these results, finding that rapid growth began to slow at around 16 years of age.[23] This sudden change in growth rate may indicate physical maturity, a hypothesis which is supported by the discovery of medullary tissue in the femur of a 16 to 20-year-old T. rex from Montana (MOR 1125, also known as "B-rex"). Medullary tissue is found only in female birds during ovulation, indicating that "B-rex" was of reproductive age.[24] Further study indicates an age of 18 for this specimen.[25] Other tyrannosaurids exhibit extremely similar growth curves, although with lower growth rates corresponding to their lower adult sizes.[26]

Over half of the known T. rex specimens appear to have died within six years of reaching sexual maturity, a pattern which is also seen in other tyrannosaurs and in some large, long-lived birds and mammals today. These species are characterized by high infant mortality rates, followed by relatively low mortality among juveniles. Mortality increases again following sexual maturity, partly due to the stresses of reproduction. One study suggests that the rarity of juvenile T. rex fossils is due in part to low juvenile mortality rates; the animals were not dying in large numbers at these ages, and so were not often fossilized. However, this rarity may also be due to the incompleteness of the fossil record or to the bias of fossil collectors towards larger, more spectacular specimens.[26]


Outdated Trex Posture

Outdated reconstruction (by Charles R. Knight), showing 'tripod' pose.

Updated Trex posture

Replica at Senckenberg Museum, showing modern view of posture.

Like many bipedal dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex was historically depicted as a 'living tripod', with the body at 45 degrees or less from the vertical and the tail dragging along the ground, similar to a kangaroo. This concept dates from Joseph Leidy's 1865 reconstruction of Hadrosaurus, the first to depict a dinosaur in a bipedal posture.[27] Henry Fairfield Osborn, former president of the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) in New York City, who believed the creature stood upright, further reinforced the notion after unveiling the first complete T. rex skeleton in 1915. It stood in this upright pose for nearly a century, until it was dismantled in 1992.[28] By 1970, scientists realized this pose was incorrect and could not have been maintained by a living animal, as it would have resulted in the dislocation or weakening of several joints, including the hips and the articulation between the head and the spinal column.[29] The inaccurate AMNH mount inspired similar depictions in many films and paintings (such as Rudolph Zallinger's famous mural The Age Of Reptiles in Yale University's Peabody Museum of Natural History)[30] until the 1990s, when films such as Jurassic Park introduced a more accurate posture to the general public. Modern representations in museums, art, and film show T. rex with its body approximately parallel to the ground and tail extended behind the body to balance the head.[20]


T rex arm

Closeup of forelimb; specimen at National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC.

When Tyrannosaurus rex was first discovered, the humerus was the only element of the forelimb known.[31] For the initial mounted skeleton as seen by the public in 1915, Osborn substituted longer, three-fingered forelimbs like those of Allosaurus.[32] However, a year earlier, Lawrence Lambe described the short, two-fingered forelimbs of the closely related Gorgosaurus.[33] This strongly suggested that T. rex had similar forelimbs, but this hypothesis was not confirmed until the first complete T. rex forelimbs were identified in 1989, belonging to MOR 555 (the "Wankel rex").[34] The remains of "Sue" also include complete forelimbs.[1] T. rex arms are very small relative to overall body size, measuring only 1 metre (3.3 ft) long. However, they are not vestigial but instead show large areas for muscle attachment, indicating considerable strength. This was recognized as early as 1906 by Osborn, who speculated that the forelimbs may have been used to grasp a mate during copulation.[35] It has also been suggested that the forelimbs were used to assist the animal in rising from a prone position.[29] Another possibility is that the forelimbs held struggling prey while it was dispatched by the tyrannosaur's enormous jaws. This hypothesis may be supported by biomechanical analysis. T. rex forelimb bones exhibit extremely thick cortical bone, indicating that they were developed to withstand heavy loads. The biceps brachii muscle of a full-grown Tyrannosaurus rex was capable of lifting 199 kilograms (439 lb) by itself; this number would only increase with other muscles (like the brachialis) acting in concert with the biceps. A T. rex forearm also had a reduced range of motion, with the shoulder and elbow joints allowing only 40 and 45 degrees of motion, respectively. In contrast, the same two joints in Deinonychus allow up to 88 and 130 degrees of motion, respectively, while a human arm can rotate 360 degrees at the shoulder and move through 165 degrees at the elbow. The heavy build of the arm bones, extreme strength of the muscles, and limited range of motion may indicate a system designed to hold fast despite the stresses of a struggling prey animal.[36]

Soft tissue[]

In the March 2005 issue of Science, Mary Higby Schweitzer of North Carolina State University and colleagues announced the recovery of soft tissue from the marrow cavity of a fossilized leg bone, from a 68-million-year-old Tyrannosaurus. The bone had been intentionally, though reluctantly, broken for shipping and then not preserved in the normal manner, specifically because Schweitzer was hoping to test it for soft tissue.[37] Designated as the Museum of the Rockies specimen 1125, or MOR 1125, the dinosaur was previously excavated from the Hell Creek Formation. Flexible, bifurcating blood vessels and fibrous but elastic bone matrix tissue were recognized. In addition, microstructures resembling blood cells were found inside the matrix and vessels. The structures bear resemblance to ostrich blood cells and vessels. Whether an unknown process, distinct from normal fossilization, preserved the material, or the material is original, the researchers do not know, and they are careful not to make any claims about preservation.[38] If it is found to be original material, any surviving proteins may be used as a means of indirectly guessing some of the DNA content of the dinosaurs involved, because each protein is typically created by a specific gene. The absence of previous finds may merely be the result of people assuming preserved tissue was impossible, therefore simply not looking. Since the first, two more tyrannosaurs and a hadrosaur have also been found to have such tissue-like structures.[37] Research on some of the tissues involved has suggested that birds are closer relatives to tyrannosaurs than other modern animals.[39]

In studies reported in the journal Science in April 2007, Asara and colleagues concluded that seven traces of collagen proteins detected in purified T. rex bone most closely match those reported in chickens, followed by frogs and newts. The discovery of proteins from a creature tens of millions of years old, along with similar traces the team found in a mastodon bone at least 160,000 years old, upends the conventional view of fossils and may shift paleontologists' focus from bone hunting to biochemistry. Until these finds, most scientists presumed that fossilization replaced all living tissue with inert minerals. Paleontologist Hans Larsson of McGill University in Montreal, who was not part of the studies, called the finds "a milestone", and suggested that dinosaurs could "enter the field of molecular biology and really slingshot paleontology into the modern world."[40]

Subsequent studies in April 2008 confirmed the close connection of T. rex to modern birds. Postdoctoral biology researcher Chris Organ at Harvard University announced, "With more data, they would probably be able to place T. rex on the evolutionary tree between alligators and chickens and ostriches." Co-author John M. Asara added, "We also show that it groups better with birds than modern reptiles, such as alligators and green anole lizards."[41]

The presumed soft tissue was called into question by Thomas Kaye of the University of Washington and his co-authors in 2008. They contend that what was really inside the tyrannosaur bone was slimy biofilm created by bacteria that coated the voids once occupied by blood vessels and cells.[42] The researchers found that what previously had been identified as remnants of blood cells, because of the presence of iron, were actually framboids; microscopic mineral spheres bearing iron. They found similar spheres in a variety of other fossils from various periods, including an ammonite. In the ammonite they found the spheres in a place where the iron they contain could not have had any relationship to the presence of blood.[43]

Skin and feathers[]

In 2004, the scientific journal Nature published a report describing an early tyrannosauroid, Dilong paradoxus, from the famous Yixian Formation of China. As with many other theropods discovered in the Yixian, the fossil skeleton was preserved with a coat of filamentous structures which are commonly recognized as the precursors of feathers. It has also been proposed that Tyrannosaurus and other closely related tyrannosaurids had such protofeathers. However, rare skin impressions from adult tyrannosaurids in Canada and Mongolia show pebbly scales typical of other dinosaurs.[44] While it is possible that protofeathers existed on parts of the body which have not been preserved, a lack of insulatory body covering is consistent with modern multi-ton mammals such as elephants, hippopotamus, and most species of rhinoceros. As an object increases in size, its ability to retain heat increases due to its decreasing surface area-to-volume ratio. Therefore, as large animals evolve in or disperse into warm climates, a coat of fur or feathers loses its selective advantage for thermal insulation and can instead become a disadvantage, as the insulation traps excess heat inside the body, possibly overheating the animal. Protofeathers may also have been secondarily lost during the evolution of large tyrannosaurids like Tyrannosaurus, especially in warm Cretaceous climates.[45]


Tyrannosaurus, like most dinosaurs, was long thought to have an ectothermic ("cold-blooded") reptilian metabolism. The idea of dinosaur ectothermy was challenged by scientists like Robert T. Bakker and John Ostrom in the early years of the "Dinosaur Renaissance", beginning in the late 1960s.[46][47] Tyrannosaurus rex itself was claimed to have been endothermic ("warm-blooded"), implying a very active lifestyle.[6] Since then, several paleontologists have sought to determine the ability of Tyrannosaurus to regulate its body temperature. Histological evidence of high growth rates in young T. rex, comparable to those of mammals and birds, may support the hypothesis of a high metabolism. Growth curves indicate that, as in mammals and birds, T. rex growth was limited mostly to immature animals, rather than the indeterminate growth seen in most other vertebrates.[23]

Oxygen isotope ratios in fossilized bone are sometimes used to determine the temperature at which the bone was deposited, as the ratio between certain isotopes correlates with temperature. In one specimen, the isotope ratios in bones from different parts of the body indicated a temperature difference of no more than 4 to 5°C (7 to 9°F) between the vertebrae of the torso and the tibia of the lower leg. This small temperature range between the body core and the extremities was claimed by paleontologist Reese Barrick and geochemist William Showers to indicate that T. rex maintained a constant internal body temperature (homeothermy) and that it enjoyed a metabolism somewhere between ectothermic reptiles and endothermic mammals.[48] Other scientists have pointed out that the ratio of oxygen isotopes in the fossils today does not necessarily represent the same ratio in the distant past, and may have been altered during or after fossilization (diagenesis).[49] Barrick and Showers have defended their conclusions in subsequent papers, finding similar results in another theropod dinosaur from a different continent and tens of millions of years earlier in time (Giganotosaurus).[50] Ornithischian dinosaurs also showed evidence of homeothermy, while varanid lizards from the same formation did not.[51] Even if Tyrannosaurus rex does exhibit evidence of homeothermy, it does not necessarily mean that it was endothermic. Such thermoregulation may also be explained by gigantothermy, as in some living sea turtles.[52][53]


New Mexico Trex Footprint

The probable Tyrannosaurus rex footprint from New Mexico.

Two isolated fossilized footprints have been tentatively assigned to Tyrannosaurus rex. The first was discovered at Philmont Scout Ranch, New Mexico, in 1983 by American geologist Charles Pillmore. Originally thought to belong to a hadrosaurid, examination of the footprint revealed a large 'heel' unknown in ornithopod dinosaur tracks, and traces of what may have been a hallux, the dewclaw-like fourth digit of the tyrannosaur foot. The footprint was published as the ichnogenus Tyrannosauripus pillmorei in 1994, by Martin Lockley and Adrian Hunt. Lockley and Hunt suggested that it was very likely the track was made by a Tyrannosaurus rex, which would make it the first known footprint from this species. The track was made in what was once a vegetated wetland mud flat. It measures 83 centimetres (33 in) long by 71 centimetres (28 in) wide.[54]

A second footprint that may have been made by a Tyrannosaurus was first reported in 2007 by British paleontologist Phil Manning, from the Hell Creek Formation of Montana. This second track measures 76 centimetres (30 in) long, shorter than the track described by Lockley and Hunt. Whether or not the track was made by Tyrannosaurus is unclear, though Tyrannosaurus and Nanotyrannus are the only large theropods known to have existed in the Hell Creek Formation. Further study of the track (a full description has not yet been published) will compare the Montana track with the one found in New Mexico.[55]


There are two main issues concerning the locomotory abilities of Tyrannosaurus: how well it could turn; and what its maximum straight-line speed was likely to have been. Both are relevant to the debate about whether it was a hunter or a scavenger (see below).

Tyrannosaurus may have been slow to turn, possibly taking one to two seconds to turn only 45°—an amount that humans, being vertically oriented and tail-less, can spin in a fraction of a second.[56] The cause of the difficulty is rotational inertia, since much of Tyrannosaurus’ mass was some distance from its center of gravity, like a human carrying a heavy timber—although it might have reduced the average distance by arching its back and tail and pulling its head and forelimbs close to its body, rather like the way ice skaters pull their arms closer in order to spin faster.[57]

Scientists have produced a wide range of maximum speed estimates, mostly around 11 metres per second (25 mph), but a few as low as 5–11 metres per second (11–25 mph), and a few as high as 20 metres per second (45 mph). Researchers have to rely on various estimating techniques because, while there are many tracks of very large theropods walking, so far none have been found of very large theropods running—and this absence may indicate that they did not run.[58] Scientists who think that Tyrannosaurus was able to run point out that hollow bones and other features that would have lightened its body may have kept adult weight to a mere 5 tons or so, or that other animals like ostriches and horses with long, flexible legs are able to achieve high speeds through slower but longer strides. Additionally, some have argued that Tyrannosaurus had relatively larger leg muscles than any animal alive today, which could have enabled fast running 40–70 kilometres per hour (25–43 mph).[59]

Jack Horner and Don Lessem argued in 1993 that Tyrannosaurus was slow and probably could not run (no airborne phase in mid-stride), because its ratio of femur (thigh bone) to tibia (shin bone) length was greater than 1, as in most large theropods and like a modern elephant.[34] However, Holtz (1998) noted that tyrannosaurids and some closely related groups had significantly longer distal hindlimb components (shin plus foot plus toes) relative to the femur length than most other theropods), and that tyrannosaurids and their close relatives had a tightly interlocked metatarsus that more effectively transmitted locomotory forces from the foot to the lower leg than in earlier theropods ("metatarsus" means the foot bones, which function as part of the leg in digitigrade animals). He therefore concluded that tyrannosaurids and their close relatives were the fastest large theropods.[60]

T-rex Leg Bone structures

Skeletal anatomy of a T. rex right leg.

Christiansen (1998) estimated that the leg bones of Tyrannosaurus were not significantly stronger than those of elephants, which are relatively limited in their top speed and never actually run (there is no airborne phase), and hence proposed that the dinosaur's maximum speed would have been about 11 metres per second (25 mph), which is about the speed of a human sprinter. But he also noted that such estimates depend on many dubious assumptions.[61]

Farlow and colleagues (1995) have argued that a 6 short tons (5.4 t) to 8 short tons (7.3 t) Tyrannosaurus would have been critically or even fatally injured if it had fallen while moving quickly, since its torso would have slammed into the ground at a deceleration of 6 g (six times the acceleration due to gravity, or about 60 meters/s²) and its tiny arms could not have reduced the impact.[7][62] However, giraffes have been known to gallop at 50 kilometres per hour (31 mph), despite the risk that they might break a leg or worse, which can be fatal even in a "safe" environment such as a zoo.[63][64] Thus it is quite possible that Tyrannosaurus also moved fast when necessary and had to accept such risks.[65][66]

Most recent research on Tyrannosaurus locomotion does not narrow down speeds further than a range from 17 to 40 kilometres per hour (11 to 25 mph), i.e. from walking or slow running to moderate-speed running. For example, a 2002 paper in the journal Nature used a mathematical model (validated by applying it to three living animals, [alligators, chickens, and humans; additionally later eight more species including emus and ostriches[67]) to gauge the leg muscle mass needed for fast running (over 40 kilometres per hour (25 mph)).[59] They found that proposed top speeds in excess of 40 kilometres per hour (25 mph) were unfeasible, because they would require very large leg muscles (more than approximately 40–86% of total body mass.) Even moderately fast speeds would have required large leg muscles. This discussion is difficult to resolve, as it is unknown how large the leg muscles actually were in Tyrannosaurus. If they were smaller, only 18 kilometres per hour (11 mph) walking/jogging might have been possible.[59]

A study in 2007 used computer models to estimate running speeds, based on data taken directly from fossils, and claimed that T. rex had a top running speed of 8 metres per second (18 mph). An average professional football (soccer) player would be slightly slower, while a human sprinter can reach 12 metres per second (27 mph). Note that these computer models predict a top speed of 17.8 metres per second (40 mph) for a 3 kilograms (6.6 lb) CompsognathusCite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too manyEstimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics, from the Journal of Proc. R. Soc. B. Published by The Royal Society, (July 2007). [40]. Written by Sellers, W.I., and Manning, P.L. (vol. 274, pp. 2711.</ref>[68] (probably a juvenile individual).[69]

Those who argue that Tyrannosaurus was incapable of running estimate the top speed of Tyrannosaurus at about 17 kilometres per hour (11 mph). This is still faster than its most likely prey species, hadrosaurids and ceratopsians.[59] In addition, some advocates of the idea that Tyrannosaurus was a predator claim that tyrannosaur running speed is not important, since it may have been slow but still faster than its probable prey.[70] However, Paul and Christiansen (2000) argued that at least the later ceratopsians had upright forelimbs and the larger species may have been as fast as rhinos.[71] Healed Tyrannosaurus bite wounds on ceratopsian fossils are interpreted as evidence of attacks on living ceratopsians (see below). If the ceratopsians that lived alongside Tyrannosaurus were fast, that casts doubt on the argument that Tyrannosaurus did not have to be fast to catch its prey.[66]


Tyrannosaurus skeleton

Skeletal restoration by William D. Matthew from 1905, which was the first reconstruction of Tyrannosaurus rex ever published[72]

Henry Fairfield Osborn, president of the American Museum of Natural History, named Tyrannosaurus rex in 1905. The generic name is derived from the Greek words τυραννος (tyrannos, meaning "tyrant") and σαυρος (sauros, meaning "lizard"). Osborn used the Latin word rex, meaning "king", for the specific name. The full binomial therefore translates to "tyrant lizard king," emphasizing the animal's size and perceived dominance over other species of the time.[31]

Earliest finds[]

Teeth from what is now documented as a T. rex were found in 1874 by A. Lakes near Golden, Colorado. In the early 1890s, J. B. Hatcher collected postcranial elements in eastern Wyoming. The fossils were believed to be from a large species of Ornithomimus (O. grandis) but are now considered T. rex. Vertebral fragments found by E. D. Cope in western South Dakota in 1892 and named as Manospondylus gigas have also been reclassified as T. rex.[12]

File:T.rex mount.png

Scale model of the never-completed Tyrannosaurus rex exhibit planned for the American Museum of Natural History, by H.F. Osborn.

Barnum Brown, assistant curator of the American Museum of Natural History, found the first partial skeleton of T. rex in eastern Wyoming in 1900. H. F. Osborn originally named this skeleton Dynamosaurus imperiosus in a paper in 1905. Brown found another partial skeleton in the Hell Creek Formation in Montana in 1902. Osborn used this holotype to describe Tyrannosaurus rex in the same paper in which D. imperiosus was described.[73] Had it not been for page order, Dynamosaurus would have become the official name. The original Dynamosaurus material resides in the collections of the Natural History Museum, in London.[74]

In total, Brown found five Tyrannosaurus partial skeletons. In 1941, Brown's 1902 find was sold to the Carnegie Museum of Natural History in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Brown's fourth and largest find, also from Hell Creek, is on display in the American Museum of Natural History, in New York.[34]

Although there are numerous skeletons in the world, only one track has been documented — at Philmont Scout Ranch in northeast New Mexico. It was discovered in 1983 and identified and documented in 1994.[75]

Notable specimens[]

Sue, at the FMoNH

"Sue" the Tyrannosaurus, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, showing the forelimbs. The 'wishbone' is between the forelimbs.

Sue Hendrickson, amateur paleontologist, discovered the most complete (more than 90%) and, until 2001, the largest, Tyrannosaurus fossil skeleton known in the Hell Creek Formation near Faith, South Dakota, on 12 August 1990. This Tyrannosaurus, nicknamed "Sue" in her honor, was the object of a legal battle over its ownership. In 1997 this was settled in favor of Maurice Williams, the original land owner, and the fossil collection was sold at auction for USD 7.6 million, making it the most expensive dinosaur skeleton to date. It has now been reassembled and is currently exhibited at the Field Museum of Natural History. A study of this specimen's fossilized bones showed that "Sue" reached full size at age 19 and died at age 28, the longest any tyrannosaur is known to have lived.[76] The "Sue" specimen apparently died from a massive bite to the head, which could only have been inflicted by another tyrannosaur.[77]

Another Tyrannosaurus, nicknamed "Stan", in honor of amateur paleontologist Stan Sacrison, was found in the Hell Creek Formation near Buffalo, South Dakota, in the spring of 1987. After 30,000 hours of digging and preparing, a 65% complete skeleton emerged. Stan is currently on display in the Black Hills Museum of Natural History Exhibit in Hill City, South Dakota, after an extensive world tour. This tyrannosaur, too, was found to have many bone pathologies, including broken and healed ribs, a broken (and healed) neck and a spectacular hole in the back of its head, about the size of a Tyrannosaurus tooth. Both Stan and Sue were examined by Peter Larson.

In the summer of 2000, Jack Horner discovered five Tyrannosaurus skeletons near the Fort Peck Reservoir in Montana. One of the specimens, dubbed "C. rex," was reported to be perhaps the largest Tyrannosaurus ever found.[78]

Tyrannosaurus Jane

"Jane" at the Burpee Museum in Rockford, Illinois.

In 2001, a 50% complete skeleton of a juvenile Tyrannosaurus was discovered in the Hell Creek Formation in Montana, by a crew from the Burpee Museum of Natural History of Rockford, Illinois. Dubbed "Jane the Rockford T-Rex," the find was initially considered the first known skeleton of the pygmy tyrannosaurid Nanotyrannus but subsequent research has revealed that it is more likely a juvenile Tyrannosaurus.[79] It is the most complete and best preserved juvenile example known to date. Jane has been examined by Jack Horner, Pete Larson, Robert Bakker, Greg Erickson and several other renowned paleontologists, because of the uniqueness of her age. Jane is currently on exhibit at the Burpee Museum of Natural History in Rockford, Illinois.[80][81]

In a press release on 7 April 2006, Montana State University revealed that it possessed the largest Tyrannosaurus skull yet discovered. Discovered in the 1960s and only recently reconstructed, the skull measures 59 inches (150 cm) long compared to the 55.4 inches (141 cm) of “Sue’s” skull, a difference of 6.5%.[82][83]

Cultural Influence[]

Since it was first described in 1905, Tyrannosaurus rex has become the most widely recognized dinosaur in popular culture. It is the only dinosaur which is routinely referred to by its full scientific name (Tyrannosaurus rex) among the general public, and the scientific abbreviation T. rex has also come into wide usage (commonly misspelled "T-Rex").[1] Robert T. Bakker notes this in The Dinosaur Heresies and explains that a name like "Tyrannosaurus rex is just irresistible to the tongue."[6]

Museum exhibits featuring T. rex are very popular; an estimated 10,000 visitors flocked to Chicago's Field Museum on the opening day of its "Sue" exhibit in 2003.[84] T. rex has appeared numerous times on television and in films, notably (in chronological order) The Lost World, King Kong, The Land Before Time, the Jurassic Park films, Barney and Friends, Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Walking with Dinosaurs, and Night at the Museum, among many others. A number of books and comic strips, including Calvin and Hobbes and Dinosaur Comics, have also featured Tyrannosaurus, which is typically portrayed as the biggest and most terrifying carnivore of all. At least one musical group, the band T.Rex, is named after the species. Tyrannosaurus-related toys, including numerous video games and other merchandise, remain popular. Various businesses have capitalized on the popularity of Tyrannosaurus rex by using it in advertisements.

General Impact[]

Tyrannosaurus rex is unique among dinosaurs in its place in modern culture; paleontologist Robert Bakker has called it "the most popular dinosaur among people of all ages, all cultures, and all nationalities".[85] From the beginning, it was embraced by the public. Henry Fairfield Osborn billed it the greatest hunter to have ever walked the earth. He stated in 1905,[86]

I propose to make this animal the type of the new genus, Tyrannosaurus, in reference to its size, which far exceeds that of any carnivorous land animal hitherto described...This animals is in fact the ne plus ultra of the evolution of the large carnivorous dinosaurs: in brief it is entitled to the royal and high sounding group name which I have applied to it.

Tyrannosaurus gained widespread public attention on December 30, 1905, when the New York Times hailed T. rex as "the most formidable fighting animal of which there is any record whatever," the "king of all kings in the domain of animal life," "the absolute warlord of the earth," and a "royal man-eater of the jungle." [87] In 1906, Tyrannosaurus was dubbed the "prize fighter of antiquity" and the "Last of the Great Reptiles and the King of Them All."[88]

In 1942, Charles R. Knight painted a mural incorporating Tyrannosaurus facing a Triceratops in the Field Museum of Natural History for the National Geographic Society, establishing the two dinosaurs as enemies in popular thought;[89] paleontologist Phil Currie cites this mural as one of his inspirations to study dinosaurs.[86] Bakker said of the imagined rivalry between Tyrannosaurus and Triceratops, "No matchup between predator and prey has ever been more dramatic. It’s somehow fitting that those two massive antagonists lived out their co-evolutionary belligerence through the very last days of the very last epoch of the Age of Dinosaurs."[89]


  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 Brochu, Christopher A. and Richard A. Ketcham Osteology of Tyrannosaurus Rex: Insights from a Nearly Complete Skeleton and High-resolution Computed Tomographic Analysis of the Skull. 2003, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, in Northbrook, Illinois. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "brochu2003" defined multiple times with different content
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 Sue's vital statistics Sue at the Field Museum. Field Museum of Natural History.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Erickson, Gregory M., Makovicky, Peter J.; Currie, Philip J.; Norell, Mark A.; Yerby, Scott A.; & Brochu, Christopher A., 2004. Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs, from the Journal of Nature, vol. 430, issue 7001, pp. 772–775. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "ericksonetal2004" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "ericksonetal2004" defined multiple times with different content
  4. Henderson, DM, 1999. Estimating the masses and centers of mass of extinct animals by 3-D mathematical slicing, from the Journal of Paleobiology, vol. 25, issue 1, pp. 88–106 [1].
  5. Anderson, JF and Hall-Martin AJ, Russell, Dale A. 1985. Long bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs, from the Journal of Zoology, vol. 207, issue 1, pp. 53–61.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 Bakker, Robert T., 1986. The Dinosaur Heresies. New York, Kensington Publishing, ISBN 0-688-04287-2
  7. 7.0 7.1 Farlow, James O., Smith MB, & Robinson, JM, 1995. Body mass, bone "strength indicator", and cursorial potential of Tyrannosaurus rex, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 15, issue 4, pp. 713–725. [2]
  8. Seebacher, Frank. 2001. A new method to calculate allometric length-mass relationships of dinosaurs, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 21, issue 1, pp. 51–60.
  9. Christiansen, Per & Fariña, Richard A., 2004. Mass prediction in theropod dinosaurs, from the Journal of Historical Biology, vol. 16, issues 2-4, pp. 85–92.
  10. dal Sasso, Cristiano and Maganuco, Simone; Buffetaut, Eric; & Mendez, Marcos A. 2005. New information on the skull of the enigmatic theropod Spinosaurus, with remarks on its sizes and affinities, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 888–896. [3]
  11. Calvo, Jorge O., and Rodolfo Coria, 1998, December. New specimen of Giganotosaurus carolinii (Coria & Salgado, 1995), supports it as the as the largest theropod ever found, from the Journal of Gaia Revista de Geociências, vol. 15, pp. 117–122. [4]
  12. 12.0 12.1 Brent H. Breithaupt, Elizabeth H. Southwell and Neffra A. Matthews, (2005-10-18). "In Celebration of 100 years of Tyrannosaurus Rex: Manospondylus Gigas, Ornithomimus Grandis, and Dynamosaurus Imperiosus, the Earliest Discoveries of Tyrannosaurus Rex in the West", from the conference of the 2005 Salt Lake City Annual Meeting, [5]. Book: Abstracts with Programs, vol. 37, issue 7, published by: the Geological Society of America, pp. 406. [6].
  13. Museum unveils world's largest T-rex skull (2006-04-07) Montana State University.
  14. Stevens, Kent A. 2006, June. Binocular vision in theropod dinosaurs, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 26, issue 2, pp. 321–330. [7]
  15. Jaffe, Eric (2006-07-01). Sight for 'Saur Eyes: T. rex vision was among nature's best, from the Journal of Science , vol. 170, issue 1, page 3. [8]
  16. 2006, Fused and vaulted nasals of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs: Implications for cranial strength and feeding mechanics, from the Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 51, issue 3, pp. 435–454. Eric Snively, Donald M. Henderson, and Doug S. Phillips. [9]
  17. Erickson, G.M. Van Kirk, S.D.; Su, J.; Levenston, M.E.; Caler, W.E.; and Carter, D.R. 1996. Bite-force estimation for Tyrannosaurus rex from tooth-marked bones, from the Journal of Nature, vol. 382, pp. 706–708.
  18. Meers, M.B., August, 2003. Maximum bite force and prey size of Tyrannosaurus rex and their relationships to the inference of feeding behavior, from the journal of Historical Biology: A Journal of Paleobiology, vol. 16, issue 1, pp. 1–12.
  19. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named holtz1994
  20. 20.0 20.1 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named paul1988
  21. Smith, J.B. Heterodonty in Tyrannosaurus rex: implications for the taxonomic and systematic utility of theropod dentitions, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 25, issue 4, pp. 865–887. December, 2005. [10]
  22. The dinosaur detectives, 1998, fromt the Journal of New Scientist. Douglas K, Young S. [11] "One palaeontologist memorably described the huge, curved teeth of T. rex as 'lethal bananas'".
  23. 23.0 23.1 Horner JR, Padian K. Age and growth dynamics of Tyrannosaurus rex, from the journal of Proceedings. Biological sciences / the Royal Society, vol. 271, issue 1551, pp. 1875–1880. 2004, September. [12]
  24. Schweitzer MH, Wittmeyer JL, Horner JR. Gender-specific reproductive tissue in ratites and Tyrannosaurus rex, from the Journal of Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 308, issue 5727, pages 1456–1460. June, 2005, [13].
  25. Lee, Andrew H. and Werning, Sarah, 2008. Sexual maturity in growing dinosaurs does not fit reptilian growth models, from the Journal of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, issue 2, pp. 582–587.
  26. 26.0 26.1 Erickson GM, Currie PJ, Inouye BD, Winn AA. Tyrannosaur life tables: an example of nonavian dinosaur population biology, from the Journal of Science (New York, N.Y.), vol. 313, issue 5784, pp. 213–7. 2006, July.
  27. Leidy, J, 1865. Memoir on the extinct reptiles of the Cretaceous formations of the United States, from the journal of Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 14, pp. 1–135.
  28. Tyrannosaurus, from the American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved on January 25th, 2009.
  29. 29.0 29.1 Newman, BH, 1970. "Stance and gait in the flesh-eating Tyrannosaurus", from the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 2, pp. 119–123.
  30. The Age of Reptiles Mural, 2008, from Yale University.
  31. 31.0 31.1 Osborn, H. F., 1905. Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs, from the Journal of the Bulletin of the AMNH, vol. 21, issue 14, pp. 259–265. Published by the American Museum of Natural History, in New York City. [14].
  32. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named osborn1917
  33. Lambe, L. M., 1914. "On a new genus and species of carnivorous dinosaur from the Belly River Formation of Alberta, with a description of the skull of Stephanosaurus marginatus from the same horizon", from the Journal of the Ottawa Naturalist, vol. 27, pp. 129–135.
  34. 34.0 34.1 34.2 John R. Horner & Don Lessem, The complete T. rex, published by: Simon & Schuster, in New York City, (1993), ISBN 0-671-74185-3
  35. Osborn, Henry Fairfield and Barnum Brown, 1906. Tyrannosaurus, Upper Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaur, from the Journal of the Bulletin of the AMNH, vol. 22, issue 16, pp. 281–296. Published by the American Museum of Natural History, in New York City. [15].
  36. Kenneth Carpenter & Matt Smith. Edited by Darren Tanke and Kenneth Carpenter. Mesozoic vertebrate life, published by the Indiana University Press in Bloomington, 2001. Pages 90–116. ISBN 0-253-33907-3 Chapter: Forelimb Osteology and Biomechanics of Tyrannosaurus rex.
  37. 37.0 37.1 Dinosaur Shocker, by Fields, Helen. From the Journal of Smithsonian Magazine, May, 2006. [16].
  38. Mary H. Schweitzer, Jennifer L. Wittmeyer, John R. Horner and Jan K. Toporski. Soft-tissue vessels and cellular preservation in Tyrannosaurus rex from the Journal of Science, vol. 307, issue 5717, pp. 1952–5. March, 2005. [17].
  39. Paul Rincon, Protein links T. rex to chickens [18] from BBC News. (2007-04-12).
  40. Dan Vergano, Yesterday's T. Rex is today's chicken. [19]. USA Today (2007-04-13).
  41. Randolph E. Schmid, Associated Press. Scientists study evidence modern birds came from dinosaurs, [20], from Newsvine. (2008-04-24).
  42. 2008, July. Dinosaurian Soft Tissues Interpreted as Bacterial Biofilms, from the Journal of PLoS ONE, vol. 3, issue 7, pp. e2808. By Thomas G. Kaye, Gary Gaugler, and Zbigniew Sawlowicz.
  43. New Research Challenges Notion That Dinosaur Soft Tissues Still Survive. Published by Newswise, (2008-07-24) [21].
  44. Tyrannosaur Skin Impression Found In Alberta. (1996-03-25). D. Tanke.
  45. Xing Xu, Mark A. Norell, Xuewen Kuang, Xiaolin Wang, Qi Zhao and Chengkai Jia. Basal tyrannosauroids from China and evidence for protofeathers in tyrannosauroids, from the Journal of Nature, vol. 431, issue 7009, pp. 680–684 (2004-10-07).
  46. Bakker, Robert T. 1968, The superiority of dinosaurs, from the Journal of Discovery, vol. 3, issue 2, pp. 11–12 [22]
  47. Robert T. Bakker, 1972. Anatomical and ecological evidence of endothermy in dinosaurs, from the Journal of Nature, vol. 238, pp. 81–85. [23].
  48. Reese E. Barrick & William J. Showers. Thermophysiology of Tyrannosaurus rex: Evidence from Oxygen Isotopes, from the Journal of Science, in New York City, vol. 265, issue 5169, pp. 222–224. 1994, July. [24].
  49. Clive Trueman, Carolyn Chenery, David A. Eberth and Baruch Spiro, 2003. Diagenetic effects on the oxygen isotope composition of bones of dinosaurs and other vertebrates recovered from terrestrial and marine sediments, from the Journal of the Geological Society, vol. 160, issue 6, page 895.
  50. Barrick, Reese E. & William J. Showers, October 1999. "Thermophysiology and biology of Giganotosaurus: comparison with Tyrannosaurus", from the Journal of Palaeontologia Electronica, vol. 2, issue 2, [25].
  51. James O. Farlow and M. K. Brett-Surman, The Complete Dinosaur, published by the Indiana University Press in Bloomington, 1999. pp. 474–490. ISBN 0-253-21313-4 Chapter: Oxygen isotopes in dinosaur bones. By Reese E. Barrick, Michael K. Stoskopf, and William J. Showers.
  52. James O. Farlow and M. K. Brett-Surman, The Complete Dinosaur, published by Indiana University Press in Bloomington, 1999. pp. 491–504. ISBN 0-253-21313-4 Chapter: A blueprint for giants: modeling the physiology of large dinosaurs, by Frank V. Paladino, James R. Spotila and Peter Dodson.
  53. David B. Weishampel, Peter Dodson and Halszka Osmólska The dinosauria University of California Press, in Berkeley, 2004. pp. 643–659. ISBN 0-520-24209-2 Chapter: Physiology of nonavian dinosaurs, by Anusuya Chinsamy, and Willem J. Hillenius.
  54. Lockley, MG and Hunt, AP, 1994. "A track of the giant theropod dinosaur Tyrannosaurus from close to the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary, northern New Mexico", from the Journal of Ichnos, vol. 3, pp. 213-218.
  55. T.rex footprint discovered. (2007). Published by the Natural History Museum.
  56. Hutchinson JR, Ng-Thow-Hing V, Anderson FC. A 3D interactive method for estimating body segmental parameters in animals: application to the turning and running performance of Tyrannosaurus rex, from the Journal of theoretical biology, vol. 246, issue 4, pp. 660–80. 2007, June.
  57. Influence of rotational inertia on turning performance of theropod dinosaurs: clues from humans with increased rotational inertia, from the Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 204, issue 22, pp. 3917–3926. Published by the Company of Biologists, [26]. Written by David R. Carrier, Rebecca M. Walter and David V. Lee (2001-11-15).
  58. Hutchinson, J.R., Biomechanical Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Bipedal Running Ability. II. Extinct Taxa, from the Journal of Morphology, vol. 262, issue 1, pp. 441–461. 2004. [27].
  59. 59.0 59.1 59.2 59.3 Hutchinson JR, Garcia M, Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner, from the Journal of Nature, vol. 415, issue 6875, pp. 1018–21. 2002, February.
  60. Thomas R. Holtz, Phylogenetic taxonomy of the Coelurosauria (Dinosauria; Theropoda), from the Journal of Paleontology, (1996-05-01), vol. 70, issue 3, pp. 536–538. [28].
  61. Christiansen, P., Strength indicator values of theropod long bones, with comments on limb proportions and cursorial potential, from the Journal of Gaia, (1998), vol. 15, pp. 241–255. [29]. ISSN 0871-5424
  62. The bigger they come, the harder they fall. J. Hecht. (1995-10-05). Published by NewScientist; page 18.
  63. Giraffe. WildlifeSafari.info.
  64. The History of Woodland Park Zoo - Chapter 4.
  65. Alexander, R.M., Dinosaur biomechanics, from the journal of Proc Biol Sci., (August 7 2006), vol. 273, issue 1596, pp. 1849–1855. Published by The Royal Society.
  66. 66.0 66.1 Hanna, Rebecca R., 2002. Multiple injury and infection in a sub-adult theropod dinosaur (Allosaurus fragilis) with comparisons to allosaur pathology in the Cleveland-Lloyd dinosaur quarry collection, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 22, issue 1, pp. 76–90. (catalogs the injuries of the Allosaurus known as "Big Al" - at least one was attributed to a fall.)
  67. Hutchinson, J.R., Biomechanical Modeling and Sensitivity Analysis of Bipedal Running Ability. II. Extinct Taxa, from the Journal of Morphology, vol. 262, issue 1, pp. 441–461. (2004). [30]
  68. T. rex 'would outrun footballer', by Seward, L. (2007-08-21). Publishing by BBCNews.
  69. Callison, G., and H. M. Quimby (1984) Tiny dinosaurs: Are they fully grown?, from the Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, vol. 3 , pp. 200–209.
  70. Manning P, Carpenter, Kenneth; & Larson, Peter E. Tyrannosaurus rex, the Tyrant King (Life of the Past), chapter 12, T. rex speed trap. Publisher: Indiana University Press, in Bloomington ,(2008), Pages 205-228. ISBN 0-253-35087-5
  71. Forelimb posture in neoceratopsian dinosaurs: implications for gait and locomotion, from the Journal of Paleobiology, vol. 26, issue 3, page 450, (September, 2000). [31]. By Paul, G.S., and Christiansen, P.
  72. The First Tyrannosaurus Skeleton, 1905, published by Linda Hall, of the Library of Science, Engineering and Technology. [32].
  73. Osborn, H.F. (1905), "Tyrannosaurus and other Cretaceous carnivorous dinosaurs", from the Journal of the Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, vol. 21, pp. 259–265.
  74. Breithaup, BH, & Southwell EH, Matthews NA, (2006), "Dynamosaurus Imperiosus and the earliest discoveries of Tyrannosaurus Rex in Wyoming and the West", from the Journal of the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin, vol. 35, pp. 257-258. [33].
  75. Footprint of a Giant. From the Online guide to the continental Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in the Raton basin, Colorado and New Mexico. (United States Geological Survey.)
  76. Stokstad, E.,"Bone Study Shows T. rex Bulked Up With Massive Growth Spurt", from the Science journal, (13 August 2004), vol. 305, issue 5686, pp. 930–931. [34].
  77. Lessons From A Tyrannosaur: The Ambassadorial Role Of Paleontology, by Brochui, C.A., from the Palaios journal. Vol. 18, issue 6, (December, 2003). [35]. Page: 475.
  78. "Dig pulls up five T. rex specimens", from BBC News (10th, October, 2000). [36].
  79. Currie, PJ Huru, JH, & Sabath, K, (2003). "Skull structure and evolution in tyrannosaurid dinosaurs" from the Journal of Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 48, issue 2, pp. 227-234 [37].
  80. Henderson, M, The origin, systematics, and paleobiology of Tyrannosauridae, edited by: Henderson, M, & published by: the Northern Illinois University Press, in Dekalb, Illinois, (In press). Chapter: Nano No More: The death of the pygmy tyrant
  81. Visit Jane the Dinosaur at the Burpee Museum, Rockford, Illinois.
  82. Museum unveils world's largest T-rex skull. [38].
  83. New Biggest T-rex Skull. [39]. By Ryan, M.J.
  84. Guinness World Records 2003, Folkard, C. Publisher: Guinness World Records Ltd., 2002. page 90. ISBN 1892051176
  85. Bakker, Robert. Edited by Fiffer, S. Tyrannosaurus Sue (2000). Publisher: W. H. Freeman & Company, in New York ISBN 0-7167-4017-6 pp. xi-xiv Chapter: Prologue.
  86. 86.0 86.1 John "Jack" Horner and Don "Dino" Lessem, The Complete T. Rex (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993), pages 58-62
  87. “Mining for Mammoths in the Badlands: How Tyrannosaurus Rex Was Dug Out of His 8,000,000 Year old Tomb,” The New York Times, December 3rd, 1905, page SM1.
  88. "The Prize Fighter of Antiquity Discovered and Restored," The New York Times December 30th, 1906, page 21.
  89. 89.0 89.1 Bakker, R.T. 1986. The Dinosaur Heresies. New York: Kensington Publishing, p. 240. On that page, Bakker has his own T. rex/Triceratops fight.

External links[]